08/01/2012 Stryker Hip Lawyer: The recent recall of Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II metal hip implants, alerted Stryker Hip Lawyers and will allow Stryker Hip Lawyers to now help injured victims of these potentially defective products. Metal hip implants have been a source of concern for some time now. It is believed the metal will corrode causing toxic metal to be released into the body. An experienced Stryker Hip Lawyer is your best resource for information and help if you are a possible victim of the recalled product(s). Best Legal Source can assist you in making contact with a knowledgeable Stryker Hip Lawyer. Call Now.
The Background of Stryker Hip Lawyer Interest
On July 6th, Stryker Orthopaedics issued a recall of their Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II metal hip modular-neck components. This recall is great news for Stryker Hip Lawyers making an attempt to give assistance to those that may have suffered. Stryker Hip Lawyers have knowledge of and been concerned about the possible serious side effects of the metal hip implants and the very real potential for additional surgeries. It is of the utmost importance to get help immediately if you believe you may be a victim of the recalled products. Let Best Legal Source assist you in contacting an experienced Stryker Hip Lawyer.
Recall of Component Leads to Stryker Hip Lawsuit
Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II modular-neck stems , the component that was recalled, is used in many of the company’s hip implant systems so it is important for your Stryker Hip Lawyer to have thorough knowledge of this event. An experienced Stryker Hip Lawyer will be aware of the scientific studies as well as the legalities of the recall. Time is of the essence. Your rights must be protected. A Stryker Hip Lawyer must have the experience and resources to go up against a well-heeled, well prepared, medical device manufacturer on your behalf.
Stryker Orthopedics issued the following statement about the recall: “While modular-neck stems provide surgeons with an option to correct certain aspects of a patient’s anatomy and hip biomechanics, given the potential risks associated with fretting and corrosion at the modular-neck junction, Stryker Orthopaedics decided to take this voluntary action”. Corrosion of metal on metal hip implants can be a very serious problem. It is possible for the metal to cause swelling, pain and lack of mobility. Another potential side effect is nonsuppurative osteomyelitis, a condition where the metal results in an inflammation and/or infection of the bone and surrounding tissues, causing great discomfort for the sufferer. It is even possible for the toxic metal to enter the bloodstream.
Best Legal Source’s Relationship with Stryker Hip Lawyer Groups
The owner of this website has no connection to or association with Stryker Orthopaedics. Terms such as Stryker Hip Lawyer, Stryker Hip Class Action Lawsuit, Stryker Class Action Lawsuit and all similar terms are descriptive in nature only. It is the sole intent of Best Legal Source to assist potential victims in getting in contact with an experienced Stryker Hip Lawyer.
Stryker Hip Lawyers are committed to helping victims of a potentially defective product protect their rights. You deserve protection and help. Have strength on your side. Contact Best Legal Source today by filling out the contact form on this page or calling our toll-free number below. Call Now.
More Assistance Through a Stryker Hip Lawsuit Document
Best Legal Source has inserted a short excerpt from an actual Stryker Hip Lawsuit, filed by a Stryker Hip Lawyer. You can read this sample as an example of what your Stryker Hip Lawsuit document may include. We have inserted several comments and headings below to make the legal document more easily understood. This sections should not be taken as legal advice or legal opinion. Please give us a call today to talk with a representative about the steps of a Stryker Hip Lawsuit and read below for a visual example.
Stryker Hip Lawyer files a Stryker Hip Lawsuit In Texas
2012 WL 2936738 (S.D.Tex.) (Trial Pleading)
United States District Court, S.D. Texas,
Mel HARRISON, Plaintiff,
STRYKER CORPORATION; Stryker Sales Corporation; and Howmedica Osteonics Corp. D/B/A Stryker.
July 5, 2012.
Explanation of Stryker Hip Lawyer Omission and Party Info
Within the Stryker Hip Lawsuit, the Stryker Hip Lawyer and party information will be given. We have omitted the name of the Stryker Hip Lawyer in this excerpt for privacy concerns. Below the Stryker Hip Lawsuit plaintiff and defendant will be listed. Best Legal Source was not involved with this Stryker Hip Lawsuit in any way and was not involved with the Stryker Hip Lawyer.
Harrison and Stryker Information in the Stryker Hip Lawsuit Party Info
Plaintiff Mel Harrison (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) is a citizen and resident of Montgomery County, Texas, and is over the age of nineteen.
Defendant Stryker Corporation (hereinafter “Defendant Stryker”) is believed to be a foreign corporation organized under the laws of the Michigan with its principal place of business in Kalamazoo, Michigan. Defendant Stryker may be served with process by serving its registered agent for service, Dean H. Bergy, 2825 Airview Blvd., Portage, Michigan 49002. Defendant Stryker has sufficient contacts with the State of Texas to give the Court jurisdiction over Defendant Stryker.
Defendant Stryker, Defendant Stryker Sales, and Defendant Stryker Orthopedics shall hereinafter be referred to, jointly and severally, as Defendant.
Sum of Stryker Hip Lawsuit Intro
In the beginning of the Stryker Hip Lawsuit, which is the only portion included in this Stryker Hip Lawsuit excerpt, the facts will be given. These facts are related by the Stryker Hip Lawyer who is representing the Stryker Hip Lawsuit plaintiff. Below, Mel Harrison’s detailed information is presented as it relates to the Stryker Hip Lawsuit.
Statement of Facts Applicable to All Parts of Stryker Hip Lawsuit Claim
Mel Harrison is a 44-year old, Corrections Officer in a private prison for the Geo Group, located in Conroe Texas. He escort inmates, monitor the inmates, inspect dorms with 30 individuals. He works long-hard hours, which he was happy to do until his body started to fail him. A short-time ago he started experiencing intolerable pain in his Left hip. This pain caused difficulty walking and constant discomfort; which, started to impede his ability to perform his duties as a corrections officer. While working as a corrections officer, directly with inmates, it is imperative that he be confident in his ability to react and defend himself and others at ALL times. As the pain continued to worsen Mel became worried about his safety.
And after realizing that pain medication would not remedy his problem, he finally went to consult his doctor. It was thereafter determined that he had severe left hip degenerative joint disease. He consulted with his Doctor and they decided that hip-replacement surgery was his best option for pain relief and stability.
Mel Harrison’s Stryker Hip Implant Leads to Stryker Hip Lawsuit
On or about November 29, 2010, Dr. Brian Thomas Chimenti at Memorial Herman Hospital, Woodlands Hospital performed a left hip arthroplasty on Plaintiff. During such surgery, a hip implant believed to be designed, manufactured and marketed by Defendants was implanted into Plaintiffs left hip. Such hip implant is identified as follows:
Despite following all of his surgeon’s instructions after his surgery including rehabilitative programs, Plaintiff began to experience incrementally increasing levels of pain in his left hip.
Hip Dislocation Prior to Stryker Hip Lawsuit
The Stryker Hip Lawyer explains below the events leading up to Stryker Hip Lawsuit action. The dislocation of Mr. Harrison’s hip implant 3 times is explained. Stryker Hip Lawsuit documents are filed for a number of reasons including chronic pain, loosening, erosion and other Metal-on-Metal specific problems. The hip dislocation described below in the Stryker Hip Lawsuit will explain why Mr. Harrison is filing this Stryker Hip Lawsuit with his Stryker Hip Lawyer against the defendant.
Events Experienced by Mr. Harrison Given by Stryker Hip Lawyer
On or about December 2, 2010, Plaintiff woke-up in that middle of the night to excruciating pain Mr. Harrisons hip popped out causing extreme pain and panic. Mr. Harrison watched his leg dangle thinking he may be paralyzed. Mr. Harrison feeling the most unstable he has ever felt in his life braced himself as his wife called 9-1-1.
After spending the entire day in the hospital having the hip reset and making the decision to postpone physical therapy. Mr. Harrison returned home only to have his hip dislocate a second time. Again Mr. Harrison was rushed back to the hospital to have the hip reset.
After attempting to heal physically, mentally and emotionally from the previous dislocations. On December 16, 2011, Mel was sitting at the computer in his bedroom and it happened for the third time, his hip dislocated. He was rushed the emergency room for the third time.
During his follow-up appointment with his surgeon, Mr. Harrison was advised that advised that acetabular components used in his surgery were defective and his surgeon recommended a revision surgery.
Stryker Hip Lawsuit and Revision Surgery’s Effects
Stryker Hip Lawsuit actions are typically filed after a revision to the original implant surgery has occurred. The revision surgery is more complex than the original implant surgery due to the defective implant remains and scar tissue. The Stryker Hip Lawsuit excerpt in the following paragraphs will detail the experience Mr. Harrison suffered. The reader will get a better understanding of why a Stryker Hip Lawyer was contacted for Mr. Harrison to pursue legal action.
Revision Surgery for Stryker Hip Lawsuit Plaintiff Harrison
The months to follow would prove almost unbearable. Mr. Harrison was instructed to stay in bed, try to avoid any movement. Mr. Harrison became paranoid and depressed, thinking he would not be able to walk normally again. He worried that he would not be able to be independent. He experience extreme mental anguish for which he was medicated.
Between November 29, 2010 and January 3, 2011, Mr. Harrison had three (3) dislocations and Finally Total Revision Hip Replacement Surgery.
During each dislocation Mr. Harrison had to be rushed to the emergency room. Due to the failure of the Stryker Total hip components, Plaintiff has suffered and continues to suffer from extreme pain and discomfort in and around her left hip.
End of Stryker Hip Lawsuit Example
Final Thoughts on Stryker Hip Lawyer Contact
After reading about the Harrison Stryker Hip Lawsuit experience, you may have additional questions for a Stryker Hip Lawyer. You can contact Best Legal Source today to be put in direct contact with a Stryker Hip Lawyer through a free consultation. Call us today to make this leap toward compensation for your suffering through a potential Stryker Hip Lawsuit claim.
Stryker Hip Lawyer Resource: